Kelly v. Gonzales
Kelly v. Gonzales
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1961
TITILOLA KELLY, Petitioner, versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A73-189-898)
Submitted: January 24, 2007 Decided: February 8, 2007
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kayode Oladele, THE JUSTICE CENTER, Detroit, Michigan, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.
Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Mark L. Gross, David White, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Titilola Kelly, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2006) (establishing a ninety-day time limitation for filing a motion to reopen); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992) (setting forth standard of review).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kelly, No. A73-189-898 (B.I.A. Aug. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.