United States v. Lyttle
United States v. Lyttle
217 F. App'x 263
United States v. Lyttle
Opinion
Terry Deshawn Lyttle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion or, in the alternative, for a reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Lyttle, No. 4:01-cr-00044-RBS (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.