Graham v. Stewart
Graham v. Stewart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6823
JESSE THOMAS GRAHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
GLENDA MCCOY, R.N.; SADIE CHAVIS, L.P.N., Defendants - Appellees, and
CHARLES STEWART, Dr., Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:04-ct-00923-H)
Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: February 15, 2007
Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse Thomas Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jesse Thomas Graham appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and awarding costs and nominal attorneys’ fees to the Defendants.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Graham v. Stewart, No. 5:04-ct-00923-H (E.D.N.C. Feb.
15, 2006; April 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We conclude we have jurisdiction over this appeal because Graham timely indicated his intent to seek appellate review of the district court’s order dismissing the complaint in his objections to the Defendants’ bill of costs, and he designated both orders in his amended notice of appeal filed within thirty days after the district court’s final order awarding costs. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 3(c)(4); Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248 (1992).
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.