U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Cordell v. Barnhart

Cordell v. Barnhart
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 2007 · Wilkinson, Williams, Michael
217 F. App'x 228

Cordell v. Barnhart

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

April G. Cordell appeals the magistrate judge’s order * affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Cordell v. Barnhart, No. 1:05-cv-00281 (W.D.N.C. May 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.