U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Powell

United States v. Powell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 23, 2007

United States v. Powell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7787

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00012-6; 5:02-cv-00138)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 23, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, William A. Brafford, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to stay the sale of forfeited real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Powell, No. 5:99-cr-00012-6 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2006). We deny Powell’s motions for release, for summary judgment, and to dismiss the Appellee’s motion to enlarge time. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.