U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Lane v. Wynne

Lane v. Wynne
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 20, 2007

Lane v. Wynne

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1853

BRUCE E. LANE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL W. WYNNE, Secretary of the Air Force; LOCAL UNION 1092, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:04-cv-01051-PJM)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce E. Lane, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D. Roth, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bruce E. Lane appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Wynne, No. 8:04-cv-01051-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.