United States v. Forde
United States v. Forde
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7758
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
BEVERLY FORDE, a/k/a Cynthia Taylor, a/k/a Margaret Hescott, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:92-cr-00429-CMH)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beverly Forde, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Beverly Forde appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of her sentence in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Forde, No. 1:92-cr-00429-CMH (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.