Hepburn v. NCIA
Hepburn v. NCIA
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1248
MARK HEPBURN, An Incompetent, by Deborah Hepburn, his Mother and Next Friend, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES, INCORPORATED (NCIA); NCIA/SAQ, LLC, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-02568-WDQ)
Submitted: January 26, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert A. Sapero, W. Timothy Sutton, SAPERO & SAPERO, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Gary R. Jones, Niccolo N. Donzella, BAXTER, BAKER, SIDLE, CONN & JONES, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mark Hepburn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hepburn v. Nat’l Ctr. on Institutions and Alternatives, Inc., No. 1:05-cv-02568-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.