United States v. Mettetal
United States v. Mettetal
220 F. App'x 200
United States v. Mettetal
Opinion
Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim P. 41(g) motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Mettetal’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mettetal, No. 3:96-cr-50034-nkm (W.D.Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.