Rogers v. Cherry
Rogers v. Cherry
220 F. App'x 198
Rogers v. Cherry
Opinion
Wilson O. Rogers, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rogers v. Cherry, No. 2:05-cv-00620-RBS (E.D.Va. Aug. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.