Harik v. NASA
Harik v. NASA
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2116
VASYL MICHAEL HARIK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, Doctor Michael Griffin, NASA Administrator, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:06-cv-00056-JBF)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vasyl Michael Harik, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Vasyl Michael Harik appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Harik’s hostile work environment, discriminatory discharge, and retaliatory discharge claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harik v. NASA, No. 4:06-cv-00056-JBF (D. Md. filed Aug. 16, 2006; entered Aug. 17, 2006). We deny Harik’s motions to place the appeal in abeyance and to include new evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.