U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry

Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2007

Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7854

OLIVER HIGUERA-PINEDA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-HC-2128-H)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oliver Higuera-Pineda, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Oliver Higuera-Pineda, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-HC- 2128-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.