U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Banks v. Stansberry

Banks v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2007 · Niemeyer, King, Duncan
219 F. App'x 303

Banks v. Stansberry

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hamilton Banks, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition so that he may refile it as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02153-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13 & Dec. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.