U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 13, 2007 · Wilkinson, Williams, Traxler
221 F. App'x 207

Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company appeals the district court’s order reforming Darla Floyd’s insurance policy to include underinsured motorist coverage and allowing Floyd to stack the coverage on her vehicles. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Floyd v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 6:04-cv-01305-GRA (D.S.C. May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.