Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
221 F. App'x 207
Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Opinion
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company appeals the district court’s order reforming Darla Floyd’s insurance policy to include underinsured motorist coverage and allowing Floyd to stack the coverage on her vehicles. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Floyd v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 6:04-cv-01305-GRA (D.S.C. May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.