Walter Christian Meyer IV appeals the district court’s order denying his motion pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Meyer v. Qualex, Inc., No. 5:04-cv00005-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.