U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Hale v. Belton Associates

Hale v. Belton Associates
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 12, 2007

Hale v. Belton Associates

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1727

MICHAEL J. HALE, d/b/a Data Base Technologies, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BELTON ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00099-GBL)

Submitted: March 2, 2007 Decided: March 12, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Forest, II, STAHL, FOREST & ZELLOE, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Aleksander Lamvol, SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael J. Hale seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss in part and denying it in part. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Hale seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.