U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Staino v. United States Parole Commission

Staino v. United States Parole Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2007 · Gregory, Michael, Per Curiam, Wilkinson
222 F. App'x 299

Staino v. United States Parole Commission

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ralph Staino, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Staino v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 5:04-hc-00962-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2005; Jan. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.