U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Martin v. Holland

Martin v. Holland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 6, 2007

Martin v. Holland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1393

BILLY G. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL HOLLAND, Trustee; JOSEPH P. BRENNAN, Trustee; MARTY D. HUDSON, Trustee; B. V. HYLER, Trustee; Trustees of the 1974 Pension Plan, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-72)

Submitted: November 22, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger W. Rutherford, WOLFE, WILLIAMS & RUTHERFORD, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Glenda S. Finch, Deputy General Counsel, Carolyn O. Dutrow, Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Billy G. Martin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging a violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Holland, No. CA-04-72 (W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.