Webb v. Pearson
Webb v. Pearson
Opinion
Michael A. Webb appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 *263 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as to defendants Pearson, Hamllet, and Nickels; awarding default judgment and $5000 damages against defendant Polite; and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm all orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Pearson, No. l:04-cv-00815-LMB (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2004; Aug. 23, 2006; and Oct. 17, 2006). We also deny Webb’s motion for summary judgment filed in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.