U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Spadaro

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Spadaro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 12, 2007 · Niemeyer, Duncan, Hamilton
224 F. App'x 209

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Spadaro

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Consolidation Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits on a claim filed by Benny Spadaro pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Spadaro, No. 05-0689-BLA (B.R.B. June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.