United States v. Terrell
United States v. Terrell
223 F. App'x 293
United States v. Terrell
Opinion
Brooks James Terrell appeals the district court order denying his motion for a reduction to his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Terrell, No. CR-99-610-HMH (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.