U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

In Re: Beattie v.

In Re: Beattie v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2007

In Re: Beattie v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1684

In Re: MICHAEL JACKSON BEATTIE,

Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge, James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge, and Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (3:06-mc-00002-JRS)

Submitted: March 9, 2007 Decided: April 11, 2007

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jackson Beattie, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Jackson Beattie appeals from an order of a three- judge panel denying his petition for reinstatement to the practice of law before the Eastern District of Virginia. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the panel. See In re: Michael Jackson Beattie, No. 3:06-mc-00002-JRS (E.D. Va. May 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.