Michael E. Taccino, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in his claim for additional monthly disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion * and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Taccino v. Barnhart, No. l:05-cv-00602-PWG (D. Md. June 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.