U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Wolff v. Barahona

Wolff v. Barahona
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 4, 2007

Wolff v. Barahona

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1143

In Re: ULISES SANTIAGO BARAHONA, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MICHAEL G. WOLFF, Trustee, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

GERARDO BARAHONA; SONIA BARAHONA; ULISES SANTIAGO BARAHONA, Defendants - Appellees, and

MASON DIXON FUNDING, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02122-DKC; AP-03-3100-PM; BK-03-3100-PM)

Submitted: April 20, 2007 Decided: May 4, 2007

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey M. Orenstein, GOREN, WOLFF & ORENSTEIN, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Gwen Hickman, HICKMAN LAW OFFICES, Vienna, Virginia; Malcolm W. Houston, LAW OFFICE OF MALCOLM HOUSTON, Potomac, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael G. Wolff, the Chapter 7 Trustee in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on his action seeking to avoid the conveyance of certain real property under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a) (2000). We have reviewed the record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wolff v. Barahona, No. 8:05-cv-02122-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.