David Farrell Sullivan appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and *122 dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm based upon the district court’s and magistrate judge’s conclusions that Sullivan’s claims are meritless. See Sullivan v. County of Spartanburg, No. 6:05-cv-01282-HFF (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.