U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

In re: Woody v.

In re: Woody v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2007

In re: Woody v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6416

In Re: ANDRE LAMAR WOODY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cv-00017)

Submitted: May 25, 2007 Decided: June 1, 2007

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Lamar Woody, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Andre Lamar Woody petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act and permission to file his petition in forma pauperis. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Woody’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.