Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank
Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1176
TORNELLO PIERCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WELLS FARGO BANK, James Hanson (Vice President), Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00755-WLO)
Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 6, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tornello Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas G. Hooper, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, Joseph Samuel Dowdy, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Tornello Pierce appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as frivolous his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. 1:06-cv-00755-WLO (M.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.