Foy v. Bank of America Corp
Foy v. Bank of America Corp
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1324
RICHARD C. FOY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; ELIZABETH H.
WHITSEL; KEN LEWIS; CAMEY P. MCMASTER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-cv-00944-FL)
Submitted: May 4, 2007 Decided: June 6, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard C. Foy, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pyle Dion, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Richard C. Foy appeals the district court’s orders granting the individual defendants’ motions to dismiss his Title VII, malicious discharge, and defamation claims, denying Foy’s motion for summary judgment, and granting summary judgment to Defendants Whitsel and Bank of America Corporation on Foy’s claims of hostile work environment, sex discrimination, retaliation, malicious discharge, and defamation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foy v. Bank of America Corp., No. 5:04-cv-00944-FL (E.D.N.C. June 15, 2005; Feb. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.