United States v. Cofield
Opinion
Keenan Kester Cofield appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his motion to reconsider, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), the denial of his “motion to correct sentence.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cofield’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Keenan Kester COFIELD, Defendant—Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished