U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Cofield

United States v. Cofield
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 19, 2007 · Widener, Michael, King
229 F. App'x 275

United States v. Cofield

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keenan Kester Cofield appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his motion to reconsider, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), the denial of his “motion to correct sentence.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cofield’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.