U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Ratliff v. Astrue

Ratliff v. Astrue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 25, 2007

Ratliff v. Astrue

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1027

JULIA ANN RATLIFF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-00005-GMW)

Submitted: July 11, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Bradwell, SHORTRIDGE & SHORTRIDGE, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, Nora R. Koch, Supervisory Regional Counsel, Elizabeth A.

Corritore, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L.

Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Julia A. Ratliff appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for summary judgment and granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on her claim for supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ratliff v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-00005-GMW (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.