United States v. Sills
United States v. Sills
234 F. App'x 143
United States v. Sills
Opinion
Claimant Matthew M. Sills appeals the district court’s order entering judgment against defendant currency in this forfeiture proceeding under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sills, No. 5:05-cv-00418-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.