U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

McKenzie v. Baugh

McKenzie v. Baugh
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 1, 2007

McKenzie v. Baugh

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6733

DEWAYNE MCKENZIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SHERRIE BAUGH, Solicitor; RICK JONES, Public Defender, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00315-RBH)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: August 1, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dewayne McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Dewayne McKenzie appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McKenzie’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. Baugh, No. 2:06-cv-00315-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.