Corrigan v. Howard
Corrigan v. Howard
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6660
MARK CORRIGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MALCOLM J. HOWARD; THOMAS P. SWAIN; ANNE HAYES; DAVID W. DANIEL; KEN MACKENZIE, MacKenzie, Incorporated, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-CT-3023-BO)
Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 31, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mark Corrigan appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Howard, No. 5:07-CT- 3023-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.