Henneghan v. Signet Construction
Henneghan v. Signet Construction
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1265
GERALD HENNEGHAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
SIGNET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC; SIGNET REALTY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC; SIGNET REALTY - BEALMONT 8&9, LLC; CH BUILDERS LLC; LOUIS J. CLEMENTE; MARK A. HIGGS; JOHNNY D.
MOSELEY; MARK A. BLANCHIETTI HOLLANDER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01443-LMB)
Submitted: July 20, 2007 Decided: August 8, 2007
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Henneghan, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri Elizabeth Cleary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gerald Henneghan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint with respect to some Defendants and granting Henneghan ten days to amend his complaint with respect to the remaining Defendant. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Henneghan seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.