Sheldon v. Lappin
Sheldon v. Lappin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6574
WYNN H. SHELDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
HARRY G. LAPPIN, Director; B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden/Regional Director; K. M. WHITE; J.
JONES; STRICKLAND; HILL; SHULTS, Acting Captain; CAPTAIN WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT TREES; LIEUTENANT GRAPPERHAUS; LIEUTENANT PITT; LIEUTENANT ALLEN; DOCTOR DEJESUS; DOCTOR RAMIREZ; DOCTOR ELLIS; IRWIN FISH, Physician Assistant; D. ROTH, Physician Assistant; P. HERRELL, R.N.; D. DUNCAN, R.N.; T. HORNSBY, R.N., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00049)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 29, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wynn H. Sheldon, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wynn H. Sheldon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sheldon v. Lappin, No. 7:06-cv-00049 (W.D. Va. Mar. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.