Venable v. Dept of Corrections
Venable v. Dept of Corrections
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6315
DEWEY KEITH VENABLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; GENE JOHNSON, V.D.O.C. Regional Director; PAGE TRUE, Warden; B. TRENT, Assistant Warden; B. CABELL, Assistant Warden; VILLARS, Counselor; MIXCELL, Counsel; LIPES, C/O; L. RIDDICK, C/O; CRENSHAW, C/O; RIDDICK, Sgt. (Currently a Lieutenant), Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00821-JRS)
Submitted: August 13, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dewey Keith Venable, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dewey Keith Venable appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Venable v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:05-cv-00821-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.