Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying as moot his motion for an unredacted copy of the record at government expense in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Reilly, No. 6:05-cv-03426-HFF (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *603 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.