U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Johnson v. Dillwyn Correctional Center

Johnson v. Dillwyn Correctional Center
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 6, 2007

Johnson v. Dillwyn Correctional Center

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6582

PHILLIP E. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DILLWYN CORRECTIONAL CENTER; NOTTOWAY CORRECTIONAL CENTER; LISA EDWARDS, Warden; MR. PERUTELLI, Assistant Warden; CHAPLAIN T.

ARMSTRONG; C. H. BOOKER, Major; TREATMENT SUPERVISOR RADCLIFF-WALKER; CAPTAIN FARMER; CAPTAIN BAKER; SERGEANT WOODSON; SERGEANT JOHNSON; SERGEANT LEE; WARDEN VAUGHAN; P. GURNEY, Assistant Warden; CAPTAIN FRAME; LIEUTENANT FERGUSON; LARRY BONDS, Rec-Dept.; COUNSELOR FITZGERALD; OFFICER BANKS; OPERATIONS OFFICER MS. CURRIN; LIEUTENANT WALTON; SERGEANT ORTEZ, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00107-jct)

Submitted: August 24, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip E. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Phillip E. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dillwyn Corr. Ctr., No. 7:07-cv-00107-jct (W.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.