General Dynamics v. Gilliam
General Dynamics v. Gilliam
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2149
In Re: MARINE ENERGY SYSTEMS CORPORATION, A South Carolina Corporation, Debtor. --------------------------- GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, versus
WILLIAM J. GILLIAM,
Defendant - Appellant, versus CBS CORPORATION, formerly known as Viacom Inc.; SIEMENS POWER GENERATION, INC., formerly known as Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp., Third Party Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:05-cv-02510-DCN; 97-bk-01929-JW; 04-bk-80020-JW)
Submitted: August 17, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wyatt B. Durrette, Jr., Christine A. Williams, DURRETTEBRADSHAW PLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Henry E. Grimball, BUIST MOORE SMYTHE MCGEE, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM: William J. Gilliam appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying his motion for a continuance of the summary judgment hearing and granting summary judgment in favor of the Third-Party Defendants on Gilliam’s third-party claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. General Dynamics Corp. v. Gilliam, Nos. 2:05-cv-02510-DCN; 97-bk-01929-JW; 04-bk-80020-JW (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.