U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Huff v. Baskerville

Huff v. Baskerville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 12, 2007 · Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Traxler, Wilkins
241 F. App'x 941

Huff v. Baskerville

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Johnny R. Huff appeals the magistrate judge’s * order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Huff v. Baskerville, No. 3:06-cv-00147-MHL (E.D.Va. Jan. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.