Anthony Murrell Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to *786 reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. 1:92-cr-00051-JFM (D.Md. May 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.