Tony Anthony Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence and his motion captioned an “unopposed motion for amended judgment and commitment order.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 5:98-cr-00037-F; 5:05-cv-00123-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because *988 the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.