Odom v. Walmart
Odom v. Walmart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6768
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WALMART; WALMART INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER; STEPHEN KEY; JUD WOODY; GLEN CHURCHILL; RONNIE COHURST; JUDGE LEAH; ADAM L. HAMPTON; JUANITA RILEY; LINDA F. ARMSTRONG; CLAYTON C. WILLIAMS; JANE P. HANAHAN; PAUL J. MCDERMOTT; FLORINTINE JACINTH; GINA L. ROBERTSON; PAMELA W. NOTO; DOROTHY HAYENES; JANET T. TEMPLE; ANTHONY C. MILLIGAN; BARBARA M. BRANTLEY; SEAN HETHINGTON; WITCOMB,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00247-PMD)
Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint without prejudice.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Odom v. Walmart, No. 2:07-cv-00247-PMD (D.S.C.
April 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished