Brown v. Dotson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit September 19, 2007

Brown v. Dotson, 242 F. App'x 19 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Benjamin Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Dotson, No. l:07-cv-00114-03MU, 2007 WL 1033359 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: James Benjamin BROWN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Sam DOTSON, in His Individual Capacity; Chris Surratt, in His Individual Capacity; James Johnson, in His Individual Capacity; Curtis Sturgill, in His Individual Capacity; Sid Harkleroad, in His Individual Capacity; Boyd Bennett, in His Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Status: Unpublished