Dumbuya v. Riley
Dumbuya v. Riley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6538
MUHAMMED DUMBUYA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN RILEY, Director; LIEUTENANT GAVIN; OFFICER MCMATH, Aiken County Detention Center; CITY OF AIKEN; COUNTY OF AIKEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:05-cv-03257-DCN)
Submitted: August 31, 2007 Decided: September 26, 2007
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muhammed Dumbuya, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Muhammed Dumbuya appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Dumbuya’s excessive
force claims brought under
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000). Dumbuya
appeals only the district court’s determination that he failed to
exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison
Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000) (“PLRA”). Even
if Dumbuya could prove exhaustion of his administrative remedies
under the PLRA, we affirm the entry of summary judgment for the
remaining reasons stated by the magistrate judge and adopted by the
district court. See Dumbuya v. Riley, No. 9:05-cv-03257-DCN
(D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2007). We also affirm the denial of Dumbuya’s
discovery motions as moot. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished