Richards v. Social Security Comm
Richards v. Social Security Comm
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1267
THOMAS H. RICHARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00084-IMK)
Submitted: September 24, 2007 Decided: October 10, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Regina L. Carpenter, MCLAUGHLIN & CARPENTER, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellant. Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, Dina White Griffin, Special Assistant United States Attorney, William B. Reeser, Supervisory Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Thomas E. Johnston, United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United Sates Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas H. Richards appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the
Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We must
uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported
by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater,
76 F.3d 585, 589(4th Cir.
1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record and
the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm. See Richards v. Soc. Sec. Comm’n, No. 3:05-cv-00084-IMK
(N.D.W. Va. Jan. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished