Peterson v. Reid
Opinion
Daniel Peterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peterson v. Reid, No. 5:06-ct-03026-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Daniel PETERSON, A/K/A Hassan Sataar, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John REID, Sargeant; John Gilbert, Correctional Officer, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished