U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2007

Ham v. SC Dept of Corrections

Ham v. SC Dept of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 26, 2007

Ham v. SC Dept of Corrections

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7239

ANGELO B. HAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (6:07-cv-01626-DCN)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 26, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. 6:07-cv-01626-DCN (D.S.C. Aug.

15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.