Short v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Short v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7001

HARVEY P. SHORT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN DOE; PRESSIE BOYKIN, Probation Agent; AUDREY E. MELBOURNE; WHITE, Assistant State Attorney; JAY CREECH, Assistant State's Attorney; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; WARDEN SMITH; RICHARD A. LANHAM, JR.; SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY, and Correctional Services; WILLIAM D. MISSOURI; WILLIAM H. MCCULLOUGH; ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE, State Trooper #1; JOHN DOE, State Trooper #2; WILLIAM DONALD SHAFFER, Governor; PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor; BISHOP L. ROBINSON; JANE DOE, Commitment Office Manager; US AIR GROUP, INCORPORATED; SHERIFF PENDERGRASS; CAPTAIN HARVEY; PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Superintendent; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL TRAINING CENTER, Warden; MARYLAND RECEPTION, DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION INSTITUTE; SUPER FRESH FOOD MARKETS OF MARYLAND, INCORPORATED; 7-ELEVEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-02217-DKC)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 25, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Short v. Doe,

No. 8:06-cv-02217-DKC (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished